|
1
|
- An inquiry into the practices of emergency services chaplains
|
|
2
|
- This presentation was prepared originally for the
- International Conference of Police Chaplains
- at the
- Annual Training Seminar, Spokane, WA
- July 2003
- and has been revised because the suit was eventually settled when the
chaplain program was disbanded.
|
|
3
|
- By the Rev. Dr. Gerald W. (Jerry) Montgomery
- President/CEO of The Workplace Institute
- A Master Chaplain for ICPC and the Federation of Fire Chaplains
- Serving as a chaplain for police and fire services since 1965
- Served as a reserve police officer, firefighter, EMT and chief
executive officer of an EMS agency
- Serving as a local church pastor since 1983
- Ordained in the United Church of Christ
|
|
4
|
- This headline appeared in May, 2003
- “Firefighters want chaplains dumped - file lawsuit to have program
disbanded”
|
|
5
|
- Who filed the lawsuit?
- The plaintiffs, who referred to themselves as the Satanic Six, include
a Baptist, an Episcopalian, a Christian Scientist, a Jew and a
self-described "rationalist agnostic”
|
|
6
|
- The mid-level officers who brought the suit said the chaplain corps was
made up almost exclusively of Christians and that the clergy had
improperly tainted the government agency with religion.
|
|
7
|
- The spokesman for the firefighters said he doesn't doubt the sincerity
of the chaplains, but objected to their use of religious language at
department functions.
|
|
8
|
- "I know it comes from their hearts," said the firefighters’
spokesman, who is Jewish.
- "But it's not my heart.
It's not my religion."
|
|
9
|
- The chaplain corps was just two years old when the suit was filed and
served a force of more than 4,000 firefighters and staff.
- Of 52 chaplains in the program, only two were from faith traditions
other than Christianity. In its 2nd year, the program added a
Buddhist and a Jew.
|
|
10
|
- The chaplains' corps replaced a peer-counseling program.
- The situation was aggravated by the fact that the chaplains were led by
a command officer of the department who also was an evangelical
Christian pastor.
|
|
11
|
- The complaint said the chaplains improperly injected religion into a
government organization.
|
|
12
|
- The complaining officers also objected to the chaplains' wearing
religious insignia while on duty.
- They said it was only a short step from chaplains counseling fellow
firefighters to proselytizing them.
|
|
13
|
- Resolution of this type of controversy comes in each individual
chaplain’s daily practice of a common ministry
- Resolution will not be legislated
- Resolution may be adjudicated
- Resolution ultimately will be decided by those whom we all serve
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
- What is the problem?
- Some chaplains and their faith communities feel that chaplains may or
should engage in uninvited religious activities while serving within a
public emergency service agency.
- Others – courts, other chaplains, some faith communities, community
groups – disagree.
|
|
16
|
- The key issues are:
- Understanding the history of chaplaincy
- Definition of appropriate chaplain conduct while serving within the
context of a public emergency services agency
- Conflicting goals of different religious traditions
- Consequences of one chaplain’s act for all chaplains!
|
|
17
|
- Let’s examine these key issues in
- reverse order
- to ensure that we all understand why our individual actions are
important to all chaplains.
|
|
18
|
- Like it or not, this controversy will produce at least one of three
possible consequences.
- Even inaction by the chaplain community will have a consequence.
|
|
19
|
- Option #1
- Chaplains will continue to be invited to work among emergency service
personnel and the communities their agencies serve
- New limits on chaplains may be imposed
|
|
20
|
- Option #2
- Chaplain programs will be excluded from working within emergency
service agencies
|
|
21
|
- Option #3
- Chaplains will continue to ignore these issues and let the courts and
those oppose chaplaincy services of any kind define chaplaincy work and
those whom chaplains may serve
|
|
22
|
- Controversy about religious practices of chaplains is caused by
chaplains and is the result of:
- Religious intolerance rather than religious pluralism
- Past and current practices by some Christian traditions that engage in
uninvited evangelism
|
|
23
|
- Keywords:
- Service
- Presence
- Appropriate chaplain actions
- On-the-job expectations
|
|
24
|
- Service and Presence
- A chaplain has only two basic tasks:
- To serve the needs of individual agency personnel as invited
- To be present, especially on the “battlefields” and during the
ceremonies
|
|
25
|
- Appropriate actions in our role as chaplains include:
- To be prepared to meet the needs of those whom they serve at all times
|
|
26
|
- Appropriate actions in our role as chaplains include:
- To be mindful and respectful of others who share the same task – or who
are being served – and who have different perspectives, traditions, and values
|
|
27
|
- Appropriate actions in our role as chaplains include:
- To be accountable to both religious and civil authorities in all things
- “Lone Rangers” aren’t welcome as chaplains
|
|
28
|
- Appropriate actions in our role as chaplains
- Are not easy to identify
- May not be comfortable for us to do
- Might require us to step aside so another chaplain can provide needed
services
|
|
29
|
- A simple test:
- You are a Jewish rabbi serving a local police department as a chaplain
- You have just been called to the scene of a natural death
- The family asks you to pray with them
- They are Christians.
- What do you do? What words do you choose?
|
|
30
|
- Another simple test:
- You are a Christian minister serving a local police department as a
chaplain
- You have just been called to the scene of a natural death
- The family asks you to pray with them
- They are Muslims.
- What do you do? What words do you choose?
|
|
31
|
- Expectations of chaplain services vary widely among police officers and
firefighters, staff, chiefs, and citizens
- Each group has different needs, hopes and responsibilities
- Often are in conflict with one another
|
|
32
|
- Should or Can a chaplain choose to serve only one group?
- Chaplains cannot – and should not place themselves or their services
so one person or group is favored and another is excluded
- Chaplains must serve everyone
|
|
33
|
- Expectations of the community
- Unlikely to see widespread agreement
- Decibel levels from various religious groups are an invalid measures
of size within a wider community
- In the United States and Canada, religious pluralism is a fundamental
cultural, community and legal value
- It also is an ordinary fact of daily life
|
|
34
|
- Make NO ASSUMPTIONS that
- Your way is the right way
- Or that your way is the only way
- Or that anyone from a different tradition will agree with you
|
|
35
|
- Chaplains, emergency service workers or communities DO NOT honor or
value a single set of common religious values and practices.
- Accept the fact that no religious tradition or community CAN presume
to be the group that defines religious values or practices for any
other group or community!
|
|
36
|
- Expectations of the faith traditions that sponsor a chaplain’s work
vary widely!
- Examples are the obvious differences between:
- Roman Catholics, Southern Baptists, Reform Judaism and Presbyterians,
Episcopalians, Buddhists, Quakers and Mormons
|
|
37
|
- All types of modern emergency service chaplaincy have deep roots in the
model of Military Chaplains
- Those roots so far have survived a federal court challenge . . . but
with limits.
|
|
38
|
- Chaplains have been a part of the United States military since the
1770s. Their service always has been characterized by
- Service to the needs of military personnel
- Presence on the battlefields and in the ceremonies of the military
services
- Inclusive of all religious traditions
|
|
39
|
- In the middle of the 19th century some Southern states had petitioned
Congress to eliminate chaplains.
- These “memorials,” were not acted upon favorably by the Congress; consequently they were never
introduced as cases to be heard in court.
|
|
40
|
- The relative calm of the Army Chaplaincy ended November 23, 1979, when
two Harvard University law students filed a lawsuit in federal court
challenging the constitutionality of the chaplaincy as an establishment
of religion.
|
|
41
|
- This was the first time the constitutionality of the military's
religious program was questioned in a formal legal procedure.
- The Harvard lawsuit finally was settled six years later without going to
the United States Supreme Court.
|
|
42
|
- Other challenges dealing with government support for religion in general
have occurred periodically and were decided in a series of court cases
ranging from local and state courts to the United States Supreme Court
level.
|
|
43
|
- What happened as a result of the Harvard lawsuit again the United States
Army Chaplaincy?
|
|
44
|
- First, the case forced the entire United States military chaplaincy into
a major (and healthy) self-examination.
- It placed all of chaplaincy programs and activities under the
microscope. The chaplaincy
eliminated some programs that did not contribute to free exercise.
|
|
45
|
- Secondly, it required every chaplain to focus clearly on providing for
the free exercise of religion as the raison d'etre of the chaplaincy.
- It also made chaplains conscious that at all costs they must avoid any
excessive entanglements between church and state, or any perception of a
violation.
|
|
46
|
- Thirdly, it made clear that there are certain vulnerabilities to the
chaplaincy as an institution.
- There also may be limits to what the chaplain corps can do under the
United States Constitution.
|
|
47
|
- While the threat of the courts evaluating every chaplain program has
been reduced, it undoubtedly will surface again in any new court
challenge.
- THAT HAPPENED IN MAY 2003 IN CALIFORNIA!
|
|
48
|
|
|
49
|
- User groups representing police and fire chiefs and sheriffs, need to
aggressively address the issues of
- Religious intolerance
- Professional chaplaincy services
- Chaplains’ Standards of Care
|
|
50
|
- Chaplain groups such as International Conference of Police Chaplains or
the Federation of Fire Chaplains need to aggressively address the issues
of
- Religious intolerance
- Professional chaplaincy services
- Chaplains’ Standards of Care
|
|
51
|
- Individual chaplains need to make personal commitments to
- Provide the highest possible level of professional services as a
chaplain
- Eliminate from their chaplaincy any act or word of religious
intolerance
- Serve humbly as chaplains letting their work speak as a testament of
their religious faith
|